General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMy pithy remarks on the passing of Charlie Kirk and the future of his movement were published in the NYT
Los Angeles26m ago
We can mourn his passing while hoping his movement is consigned to the ashbin of history.
Reply35 RecommendShare
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/01/us/politics/charlie-kirk.html?regi_id=66616875&template_id=744&tracking_id=biza-10H481LqjL8x9v7&user_id=40fefc89094ec3e1a20f3e9e7222b0ec#permid=145639049
hlthe2b
(111,962 posts)Botany
(75,718 posts)Less than two weeks after the murder of the conservative activist and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, his widow, Erika Kirk, the organizations new chief executive, convened a senior staff meeting at the groups Phoenix headquarters to discuss its future. A murderer tried to silence my husband, she told them by video conference from her home in Scottsdale, Ariz., according to two of the attendees. I wont let that happen.

LetMyPeopleVote
(171,999 posts)riversedge
(78,594 posts)PCIntern
(27,752 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(11,293 posts)usonian
(22,011 posts)and his merry band of fascists and thieves.

Gimpyknee
(903 posts)You have to admit that was the most epic mic drop ever!
GoneOffShore
(17,934 posts)Jack Valentino
(3,812 posts)Bluetus
(1,785 posts)"He died doing what he loved."
I don't know if this applies to Kirk. Most of these well-paid, professional RWers seem pretty phony to me.
Strange thing, when a roofer falls to his death, or a pipe-fitter dies in a natural gas explosion, nobody says "they died doing what they loved."
I don't believe in the afterlife, but wouldn't it be interesting to be able to ask Kirk if all the money and power he got by being a professional racist and political agitator was really worth it?
H2O Man
(78,155 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(101,445 posts)It was an amazing show of grace. Wallace was reportedly said to have cried. I can't imagine how emotional it must have been. She said what happened to him shouldn't happen to anyone. That's how I feel about Kirk
H2O Man
(78,155 posts)Every act of violence -- especially the extreme violence of killing human beings -- degrades the social fabric.
That's not to say I liked or respected Kirk. I've seen his style of "debate," which is one of the first I studied when I was in my early 20s. When used in debate with a young college student with an undeveloped frontal lobes, one can at very least create confusion if they are right and you are wrong. In studying Malcolm X's style of debate (among others), it is relatively easy to spank a Charlie Kirk. One merely has to be patient for the first 5 to 7 minutes, and toss a few bread crumbs that they will seek to exploit and capitalize on.
I prefer that to murder.
ananda
(33,822 posts)A Plus
AdamGG
(1,823 posts)There's a reason he didn't spend his time debating people like Robert Reich or James Carville because they would have utterly exposed him and created video that he would not want to exist.
The memorials to him with federal orders to fly flags at half staff almost make me nostalgic for the quaint time when Dump was merely halting the State of the Union address to award the Medal of Freedom to Limbaugh.
Happy Hoosier
(9,191 posts)... that I feel no ombligation to "mourn" his passing.
Did I want him killed? No. Do I advocate that kind of violnece? No. Am I sorry he is gone? Not in the least. I think the world is better place without him.
Linda ladeewolf
(1,010 posts)Id check it out. The links on the archive are live. Charlie Kirk is less important than trumps speech to the military.
AStern
(574 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(101,445 posts)The subscription is around twenty three dollars a months. I used to get the hard copy delivered to my home in the days of "yore". I can still remember as a kid growing up in NYC being taught in school how to fold it so you could read it on the subway. I also subscribe to the New Yorker, New York magazine, The Atlantic, and WAP0.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,445 posts)niyad
(128,155 posts)and mealy-mouthed aboutt that agitating, misogynist, racist, homophobic POS??? Funny, you left out ALL of that, you uselesss, used-to-be "reporters". Absolutely disgusting, but not surprising.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,445 posts)Most of the editorials basically argued his murder was abominable, but he said a lot of inflammatory and hurtful things .
niyad
(128,155 posts)none of his hattred and bigotry.
lonely bird
(2,601 posts)No, I dont mourn his passing. I think it was sad for his family. His life was spent self-promoting and sowing division. Belief is not, despite what some say, a get out of jail free card.
ultralite001
(2,220 posts)..."the organizations new chief executive [Erika Kirk], convened a senior staff meeting at the groups Phoenix headquarters to discuss its future."
+
'A murderer tried to silence my husband,' she told them by video conference from her home in Scottsdale, Ariz., according to two of the attendees."
The new chief wouldn't drive 12 miles to meet w/ senior staff in person??? WTF???

Passages
(3,848 posts)Charming.
We have decayed as a society and must find a way back.
SheltieLover
(74,776 posts)poozwah
(378 posts)the only sadness i feel about this incident is the fact that many americans are praising this man who espoused so many unamerican ideals. charlie kirk was not great. charlie kirk was not a man who parents in this country should encourage their children to emulate. charlie kirk did not want to fix the finest government ever seen on this earth, he only wanted to destroy it.
Blue renter
(12 posts)I am a blue person in a red office -- staff and bosses -- and they have been going on about C. Kirk. What or how would you respond to them. I need your help because I am not good at this. Especially this
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/9yRtv4cbTQw
What do I say?
flashman13
(1,688 posts)If I may quote from the Times article, "Those staff members have now rallied around their new leader, taking comfort in Mrs. Kirks devoutness as well as her previous experience as a public speaker and entrepreneur of a Christian-themed clothing line." I'm not the least bit religious, but I have taken time to red the words in red in the bible that are purported to be from the public speaker know as Jesus. I'm having a hard time squaring the circle between devoutness and "a Christian-themed clothing line". The grift never ends.
Martin68
(26,582 posts)quakerboy
(14,596 posts)THAT is what his epitaph should be. His memorial.
Kirk should never again be mentioned without pivoting to the Epstein files.
GoneOffShore
(17,934 posts)Everything the dead stochastic terrorist said consisted of straw-men, bad faith arguments, goal post moving, deflection, projection, false premises, and just plain egregious fuckwittery. It was a mind boggling hurricane of crazy crap.
Listening to him debate was like being bombarded with turds.
His name should never be mentioned again.
https://gregolear.substack.com/p/ramble-on-damnatio-memoriae-video