Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Chasstev365

(7,798 posts)
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 08:42 AM Dec 2025

A simply way to summarize the Orange Man's administration:

No matter what the issue, the law applies to you, but not us.

From releasing the Epstein Files to failing to funding things approved by Congress, we do what we want, and at the same time we will prosecute you for anything we can use against you.

Ask a MAGA why this is acceptable to them

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A simply way to summarize the Orange Man's administration: (Original Post) Chasstev365 Dec 2025 OP
I live among Magats, gab13by13 Dec 2025 #1
If you told them that pardoning Sandusky would get the Nittany Lions .... paleotn Dec 2025 #4
I've stopped bothering to debating them and just skip to getting them to... Ol Janx Spirit Dec 2025 #6
I'm farily certain Sailingdiver Dec 2025 #2
Exactly this! Dave in VA Dec 2025 #5
All peel an no citrus. twodogsbarking Dec 2025 #3
They're really going after trans kids mountain grammy Dec 2025 #7
Sex rejection? LOL! And yet, its far from funny... slightlv Dec 2025 #8
I was listening to the press conference mountain grammy Dec 2025 #10
It is perfectly acceptable to them hurple Dec 2025 #9

gab13by13

(32,343 posts)
1. I live among Magats,
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 08:49 AM
Dec 2025

it does zero good to debate them, to use logic on them. I flat out tell them that they voted for a party that protects pedophiles. I tell them that it was a lie that Democrats are the pedophile party, it is Republicans who are protecting the rich people who raped little girls.

I am from Pa. so I also tell them that if Jerry Sandusky gave Trump enough money he would pardon him too, I say that even Marjorie Taylor Greene gets it, then I walk away and ignore them.

paleotn

(22,219 posts)
4. If you told them that pardoning Sandusky would get the Nittany Lions ....
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 10:08 AM
Dec 2025

in the College Football Playoff every year for the next 10, they'd happily go along. Point being, those PA magats you mention are so compromised morally that letting obvious criminality slide in order to "own the libs", "feel less inadequate", "shit on brown people" or whatever is easy for them. They don't give two shits about pedos as long as they're getting what THEY want. Epstein and the documentation about his antics mean nothing to them unless it involves Dems. It's all about politics and their fucked up political tribe. NOT about the immorality and criminality. They don't give a shit about that.

Magat trash are the most immoral and unethical part of American society, so they don't care if their dear leader rapes young girls. They only wish they could and get away with it too.

Ol Janx Spirit

(1,013 posts)
6. I've stopped bothering to debating them and just skip to getting them to...
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 10:35 AM
Dec 2025

...think about what their own red lines are. Almost all of them do have them on various issues when forced to think about it.

My theory is that making them think about it will make them keenly aware of it when the lines are crossed. It may not stop them, but it is harder to ignore the hypocrisy in yourself when you've had to say it out loud to someone.

When I think about all the lines that have been crossed already by conservatives I lament not doing it sooner. At the very least, when those lines are crossed and you see them again you can ask WTF? It's hard to hide from things you said to someone out loud. They can't pretend they were always onboard with it--all they can do is try to justify why they changed their opinion, and that is far more difficult than pretending it was your opinion all along.

The hardest part is anticipating what the new red lines should be.

Sailingdiver

(365 posts)
2. I'm farily certain
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 09:34 AM
Dec 2025

That as long as the orange hued disaster continues to attack POC and enables the cult's racism they are ok with anything their pedo in chief does.

mountain grammy

(29,037 posts)
7. They're really going after trans kids
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 10:47 AM
Dec 2025

disgusting press conference using the term "sex rejecting" over and over. WTF is that even? Never have I heard that before from medical professionals.. These people are evil beyond imagination..

slightlv

(7,790 posts)
8. Sex rejection? LOL! And yet, its far from funny...
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 11:21 AM
Dec 2025

it's just funny the names they come up with to try to describe their prejudices as anything except prejudice. How about we call it "doctor misidentification" which is where some of it no doubt comes from? Gender actually is fluid, and is made to fit in a small box. If it doesn't fit neatly in that box, the doc makes the best guess he can to get something filled in on the birth certificate. It's not the kid's fault... the kid was misrepresented from the very beginning in these cases!

mountain grammy

(29,037 posts)
10. I was listening to the press conference
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 12:28 PM
Dec 2025

and Oz and Kennedy kept using the term. of course it's difficult to understand "gravel throat" and Oz is an idiot, but I thought I was hearing "sex denying".. and when I read transcripts is was "sex rejecting" both non medical or scientific terms.. Shame on these people..

Puts every trans person in America in danger, this kind of bullshit.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A simply way to summarize...