Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFrom the Guardian: Melania review - Trump film is a gilded trash remake of The Zone of Interest
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/jan/30/melania-review-trump-film-is-a-gilded-trash-remake-of-the-zone-of-interest-snip-
This mood of cosy conviviality extends all the way through the opening credits; at which point the chill descends and the novocaine kicks in, as the films star and executive producer proceeds to guide us with agonising glacial slowness through the preparations for her husbands second presidential inauguration. She glides from the fashion fitting to the table setting, and from the candlelit dinner to the starlight ball, with a face like a fist and a voice of sheet metal. Candlelight and black tie and my creative vision, she says, as though listing the ingredients in a cauldron. As first lady, children will always remain my priority, she coos, and you can almost picture her coaxing them into her little gingerbread house.
No doubt there is a great documentary to be made about Melania Knauss, the ambitious model from out of Slovenia who married a New York real-estate mogul and then found herself cast in the role of a latter-day Eva Braun, but the horrific Melania emphatically isnt it. Its one of those rare, unicorn films that doesnt have a single redeeming quality. Im not even sure it qualifies as a documentary, exactly, so much as an elaborate piece of designer taxidermy, horribly overpriced and ice-cold to the touch and proffered like a medieval tribute to placate the greedy king on his throne.
-snip-
Its dispiriting, its deadly and its spectacularly unrevealing. Ratners film plays like a gilded trash remake of Jonathan Glazers The Zone of Interest in which a button-eyed Cinderella points at gold baubles and designer dresses, cunningly distracting us while her husband and his cronies prepare to dismantle the Constitution and asset-strip the federal government. White and gold thats so you, purrs one of her lickspittles as she busies herself with the colour-scheme for the ball and the incoming first lady allows that yes indeed, this is true.
Its no spoiler to reveal that phew, thank heavens, Trumps second inauguration goes swimmingly well in the end. This despite the unfortunate clash with the college football game. This despite the infuriating looseness of the first ladys white blouse. The preparations are exhausting but the euphoria of the moment sees her through, all the way to the starlight ball where she briefly boogies along to the Village Peoples YMCA. Being awake for 22-hours felt like nothing, she gushes, which is nice to hear and good for her. But the funs not infectious and the guests are a nightmare, and two hours of Melania feels like pure, endless hell.
This mood of cosy conviviality extends all the way through the opening credits; at which point the chill descends and the novocaine kicks in, as the films star and executive producer proceeds to guide us with agonising glacial slowness through the preparations for her husbands second presidential inauguration. She glides from the fashion fitting to the table setting, and from the candlelit dinner to the starlight ball, with a face like a fist and a voice of sheet metal. Candlelight and black tie and my creative vision, she says, as though listing the ingredients in a cauldron. As first lady, children will always remain my priority, she coos, and you can almost picture her coaxing them into her little gingerbread house.
No doubt there is a great documentary to be made about Melania Knauss, the ambitious model from out of Slovenia who married a New York real-estate mogul and then found herself cast in the role of a latter-day Eva Braun, but the horrific Melania emphatically isnt it. Its one of those rare, unicorn films that doesnt have a single redeeming quality. Im not even sure it qualifies as a documentary, exactly, so much as an elaborate piece of designer taxidermy, horribly overpriced and ice-cold to the touch and proffered like a medieval tribute to placate the greedy king on his throne.
-snip-
Its dispiriting, its deadly and its spectacularly unrevealing. Ratners film plays like a gilded trash remake of Jonathan Glazers The Zone of Interest in which a button-eyed Cinderella points at gold baubles and designer dresses, cunningly distracting us while her husband and his cronies prepare to dismantle the Constitution and asset-strip the federal government. White and gold thats so you, purrs one of her lickspittles as she busies herself with the colour-scheme for the ball and the incoming first lady allows that yes indeed, this is true.
Its no spoiler to reveal that phew, thank heavens, Trumps second inauguration goes swimmingly well in the end. This despite the unfortunate clash with the college football game. This despite the infuriating looseness of the first ladys white blouse. The preparations are exhausting but the euphoria of the moment sees her through, all the way to the starlight ball where she briefly boogies along to the Village Peoples YMCA. Being awake for 22-hours felt like nothing, she gushes, which is nice to hear and good for her. But the funs not infectious and the guests are a nightmare, and two hours of Melania feels like pure, endless hell.
Wikipedia page on The Zone of Interest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Zone_of_Interest_(film)
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
From the Guardian: Melania review - Trump film is a gilded trash remake of The Zone of Interest (Original Post)
highplainsdem
5 hrs ago
OP
LetMyPeopleVote
(176,235 posts)1. Here is another review

Rebl2
(17,500 posts)2. Should
Likely get no stars
Johonny
(25,700 posts)3. Its got 8 percent on rotten tomatoes.
99 percent audience score. Bots, no doubt
Raastan
(282 posts)4. OMG! Brilliant!
I haven't laughed that hard in a long time!!!
3catwoman3
(28,787 posts)5. "...doesn't have a single redeeming quality."
Just like her POS husband.