'President Trump's name in the unredacted Epstein files... "more than a million times."' 'Rep. Jamie Raskin

[Joinfortmill]

https://www.axios.com/2026/02/10/trump-epstein-files-jamie-raskin-unredacted

'Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) told Axios in an interview Tuesday that when he searched President Trump's name in the unredacted Epstein files the previous day, it came up "more than a million times."'

My words: TickTock, you motherf*cker.

[pandr32]

1. He (DT) will destroy everything he can while in his death spiral.

He cannot keep things hidden no matter what he tries.

[BeyondGeography]

2. Trump likes to put his name on things

We should start calling them the Trump Epstein files.

[Marie Marie]

14. Yeah, this is probably the only place where he doesn't want to see his name plastered all over.

[SeattleVet]

17. That's what I have been calling them for months now.

[Coldwater]

3. Trump lied about banning Epstein from Mar-a-Lago

[flvegan]

4. "That's because Epstein loved the trumpet. Lying dems, fake news!" - Karoline Leavitt, probably

[calimary]

21. Can't wait til THIS gal's gone.

But she’ll probably just be folded into the Pox Noise lineup. I’d expect her to be added as some sort of “expert insider” or “commentator”.

[C Moon]

5. How is that even possible? I saw someone say 70,000, and I thought that was silly.

Who on earth has mentioned anything more than a million times? Wow, we live in a crazy frigging world if that's true.

[bluestarone]

6. Well, maybe they are after

Discovery? THAT is the only way to prove it wrong i'm thinking?

[C Moon]

7. I have no problem w them saying that, it's just mind-blowing.

Those rich people are freaks.

[bluestarone]

9. I hear ya!!

It is crazy for sure!!

[C Moon]

10. What I'm thinking is they are including the threads in replies in email.

But still. Whew.

[Farmer-Rick]

12. Yeah, those disgusting pedos seem to come with billion dollar price tags

Imagine having more money than you would ever spend in a lifetime. So, you can do practically anything you want.

And You Chose to Rape Little Children.

I can't imagine that even being a desire let alone something you act out in real life.

Which comes first? The excess wealth or the depraved impulses?

[reACTIONary]

18. Epstein collected news stories ...

..... and other articles about people of interest, including tsf. And any one such article could have multiple mentions.

Over all, however, this is probably, to put it politely, hyperbole, it being alongside the assertion that Epstein was running a "billion dollar international sex trafficking ring." Which is ridicules.

[Joinfortmill]

22. Jeffrey Epstein had accounts with Goldman Sachs and HSBC, documents show

Last edited Wed Feb 11, 2026, 08:34 AM - Edit history (1)

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jeffrey-epstein-had-accounts-goldman-172755291.html

https://www.reuters.com/legal/jpmorgan-processed-more-than-1-bln-epstein-us-virgin-islands-says-2023-09-01/

My words: This is just JPMorgan Chase

NEW YORK, Aug 31 (Reuters) - A lawyer for the U.S. Virgin Islands said on Thursday that JPMorgan Chase (JPM.N)..told U.S. authorities it processed more than $1 billion for Jeffrey Epstein over 16 years.

[reACTIONary]

23. Nobody makes or takes ...

... A billion dollars in international sex trafficking. There are no "billion dollar international sex trafficking" rings. Sex is a local enterprise. "International rings" can't compete.

Epstein is guilty as charged, but he was never charged with running an "international sex trafficking" ring. And there is no evidence that he did.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fbi-concluded-jeffrey-epstein-wasn-153019688.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/files-show-fbi-found-no-135350458.html

[Joinfortmill]

24. I posted about his bank accounts.

[reACTIONary]

25. OK. In the context of a post that....

... called the assertion that Epstein was running a "billion dollar international sex trafficking ring" hyperbole, what was the purpose of pointing out that he had more than $1 billion in financial transactions over the course of 16 years? What were you getting at?

[Joinfortmill]

26. Just providing information.

[reACTIONary]

27. OK - Thanks!

[Raven123]

8. I guess explains the multiple millions of files they didn't release

[Clouds Passing]

11. He's the Trumpstein file popularity contest winner!

[Martin68]

13. How could a name appear a million times in any set of documents? That sounds like a mistake.

[Dan]

15. Thinking...

From what I think that was shared...there are over 6 million documents. If Trump was close friends with Epstein as has been reported - then it might be possible based on what the role of Trump was/is in the documents.

[70sEraVet]

20. I guess its possible that Raskin pulled that number out of thin air....

just to jack his jowls. Which is fine with me. If trump gets goaded into disputing the number of times he is mentioned, it will be a win for Raskin!

[KPN]

16. Just a million?

Oh, more than … heck, could be every other page!

[Chasstev365]

19. The lead story of Goebellsvision (Faux News) tonight, right?

[LetMyPeopleVote]

28. trump breaks another record

Donald breaks another record.

— Mrs. Betty Bowers (@mrsbettybowers.bsky.social) 2026-02-10T20:08:26.855Z