Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

applegrove

(133,661 posts) Sat Jun 20, 2026, 04:47 PM 19 hrs ago

Adam Kinzinger:

Todayâ€™s episode of â€œyou canâ€™t make this up:â€

Trump set out to prove voter fraud in the voting machines. And found not a single instance of fraud, so theyâ€™re pretending the study never happened
— Adam Kinzinger (@adamkinzinger.substack.com) 2026-06-20T16:57:54.984Z

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Adam Kinzinger: (Original Post) applegrove 19 hrs ago OP

Prelude to the Nov. elections. paleotn 17 hrs ago #1

And the donald will be interfering all over the place. calimary 16 hrs ago #2

The thing is, he's side isn't catching anyone flat footed this time around. paleotn 16 hrs ago #3

paleotn

(23,038 posts)

1. Prelude to the Nov. elections.

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Sat Jun 20, 2026, 07:13 PM

17 hrs ago

It's going to be a legal shit show from 11/4/26 until the swearing in in early Jan 2027. A repeat of Nov. 2020 to Jan 2021. Minus the insurrection, since few of them can afford the gas to drive to DC this time around.

calimary

(91,345 posts)

2. And the donald will be interfering all over the place.

Reply to paleotn (Reply #1)

Sat Jun 20, 2026, 07:30 PM

16 hrs ago

ANYTHING to foul up the works, especially if we see enough to know his side lost.

paleotn

(23,038 posts)

3. The thing is, he's side isn't catching anyone flat footed this time around.

Reply to calimary (Reply #2)

Sat Jun 20, 2026, 07:53 PM

16 hrs ago

We all know his game. States, candidates, Democratic Party, et. al., will be ready for them. We're lying in wait.

Reply to this discussion