Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(183,777 posts)
Mon Jun 22, 2026, 02:54 PM 19 hrs ago

In blow to Trump, federal judge blocks DHS from using citizenship database to purge voters

trump's plan to develop his own database of eligible voters and use this to purge voters he does not like is NOT going to work. trump has sued a number of states to get this data and has lost every lawsuit. I am pissed that asshole Greg Abbott gave trump the data base for Texas voters

In blow to Trump, federal judge blocks DHS from using citizenship database to purge voters
www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/...

Jacob Knutson (@jaknutson.bsky.social) 2026-06-22T18:14:13.777Z

https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/in-blow-to-trump-federal-judge-blocks-dhs-from-using-citizenship-database-to-purge-voters/

A federal judge in Washington D.C. blocked the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from using its citizenship database to remove voters from registration rolls, striking a significant blow against President Donald Trump’s unconstitutional attempt to take control of federal elections.

In her decision Monday, District Court Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan excoriated Trump and DHS’s implementation of his March 25 executive order for ignoring federal privacy laws as they overhauled the Systemic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) system into a faulty citizenship checker.

“All in all, the federal government has knowingly trampled on the privacy rights of American citizens in a manner that threatens the sacred right to vote,” District Court Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan wrote. “This Court cannot stand idly by while that happens.”

The League of Women Voters led a coalition of voting and privacy advocates in challenging the changes to SAVE last year, suing DHS, the Social Security Administration (SSA) and other federal actors. While Sooknanan declined to issue a stay last November, she granted a summary judgment Monday, saying that the modification of the SAVE system violated the Social Security Act’s prohibition on disclosing social security numbers, various provisions of the 1974 Privacy Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In blow to Trump, federal judge blocks DHS from using citizenship database to purge voters (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote 19 hrs ago OP
Good! Predictable, but good! MineralMan 18 hrs ago #1
Federal judge comes through for democracy again! oasis 18 hrs ago #2
Blistering new ruling finds Trump's agencies 'knowingly trampled' on a sacred right LetMyPeopleVote 18 hrs ago #3
+1 dalton99a 10 hrs ago #9
I'm a little confused. Raven123 18 hrs ago #4
Does this mean his attempts to get the SAVE act attached to bills in Congress are moot? Sweet Rosie Red 18 hrs ago #5
No, trump was trying to use an Executive Order to get the same thing as the SAVE Act LetMyPeopleVote 17 hrs ago #7
Thank You! Sweet Rosie Red 10 hrs ago #8
What about the Federal government does not run elections malaise 17 hrs ago #6

LetMyPeopleVote

(183,777 posts)
3. Blistering new ruling finds Trump's agencies 'knowingly trampled' on a sacred right
Mon Jun 22, 2026, 03:20 PM
18 hrs ago

This opinion made me smile

The White House’s revamped voter-citizenship database has been ruled illegal. A federal judge noted that the centralized system illegally swept up the private data of millions of Americans, wrongly flagging many U.S. citizens as non-citizens.

Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2026-06-22T19:05:37Z

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-voter-fraud-2677076169

A federal judge on Monday struck down the Trump administration's revamped voter-citizenship database, ruling that federal agencies broke the law by building a centralized system that swept up the private data of millions of Americans and wrongly flagged U.S. citizens as non-citizens.

In a sharply worded opinion, U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan vacated the 2025 overhaul of the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE, system, along with two related privacy notices issued by the Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration. She found the changes violated the Social Security Act, the Privacy Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act

"[T]he federal government has knowingly trampled on the privacy rights of American citizens in a manner that threatens the sacred right to vote," Sooknanan wrote. "This Court cannot stand idly by while that happens."

The overhaul followed President Donald Trump's March 2025 executive order on elections that expanded SAVE to include records of natural-born citizens, tap Social Security data including SSNs, as well as let states run their entire voter rolls through the system in bulk.

The judge, an appointee of President Joe Biden, noted internal records showed the agencies knew the database was "not in compliance" with the Privacy Act and that accuracy shortfalls "could cause incomplete or false results." Naturalized citizens with outdated Social Security files were among those wrongly flagged as non-citizens, with some forced to prove citizenship within 30 days or lose their registrations. An investigation in one Texas county found a quarter of the system's "non-citizen matches" were people who had already proven citizenship, the court filing detailed.

Here is a link to the 75-page opinion
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.285454/gov.uscourts.dcd.285454.111.0_1.pdf

Raven123

(8,026 posts)
4. I'm a little confused.
Mon Jun 22, 2026, 03:50 PM
18 hrs ago

She didn’t issue a stay in November, but now declared summary judgement. Was this declaration issued in time to achieve its stated goal?

Sweet Rosie Red

(186 posts)
5. Does this mean his attempts to get the SAVE act attached to bills in Congress are moot?
Mon Jun 22, 2026, 03:56 PM
18 hrs ago

Serious question. I’ve been holding my breath over this one forever, for my sisters, daughters in law, nieces, grand daughters and everyone in this country. I applied for my passport card last week in case he puts ICE at polling stations. As a resident of Minnesota, I've seen what that “man” is willing to do to people, and I will not let him have my vote without a fight. I will keep contacting my reps if it could still pass!

LetMyPeopleVote

(183,777 posts)
7. No, trump was trying to use an Executive Order to get the same thing as the SAVE Act
Mon Jun 22, 2026, 04:09 PM
17 hrs ago

If Congress passes the SAVE Act, many of these provisions might become legal. In the alternative, the SAVE Act will depress the vote and help the GOP./trump to win without this illegal executive order

malaise

(299,488 posts)
6. What about the Federal government does not run elections
Mon Jun 22, 2026, 04:07 PM
17 hrs ago

do these MAGAts fail to understand?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In blow to Trump, federal...