Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(165,890 posts)
Sat Jan 10, 2026, 07:09 PM 20 hrs ago

Congress Is Reversing Trump's Steep Budget Cuts to Science

Source: New York Times

Jan. 10, 2026 Updated 10:47 a.m. ET


Congress is racing to undo thousands of cuts to federal science programs that President Trump called for last year when planning the government’s current budget. If enacted, the president’s bid for an overall cut in scientific funding to $154 billion from $198 billion — a plunge of 22 percent — would have been the largest reduction in federal spending on science since World War II, when Washington and the seekers of nature’s secrets began their partnership.

This week, the Senate Appropriations Committee released a bipartisan package of bills that largely scraps Mr. Trump’s planned cuts. Analysts say that, if the proposed budgets hold up in the weeks ahead, Congress will set aside roughly $188 billion for federal research — a drop of about 4 percent from the most recent annual budget. “That’s pretty solid,” said Alessandra Zimmermann, a budget analyst at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, a scientific group based in Washington. “Congress is really starting to push back.”

Surprisingly, analysts foresee a possible rise of more than 2 percent in the budget category known as basic research — the blue-sky variety that produces fundamental strides and spinoffs in fields such as health care and artificial intelligence. Last year, the Trump administration called for a cut in federal basic research of more than one-third.

Mr. Trump sought even larger cuts for the National Science Foundation, which sponsors much of the nation’s basic research. He proposed that its budget be slashed to $3.9 billion from $8.8 billion, a drop of 56 percent. The Senate package countered with a reduction to $8.75 billion, or less than 1 percent.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/10/science/trump-science-budget-cuts-congress.html



No paywall (gift)
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Congress Is Reversing Trump's Steep Budget Cuts to Science (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 20 hrs ago OP
stop. they are giving trump money to spend on things he and rfk consider science rampartd 20 hrs ago #1
Good! The worthless POS in the WH knows nothing about the Sciences and he had to be told what nuclear weapons were SWBTATTReg 20 hrs ago #2
But can't the 🍑🐖💩 veto the bill? kimbutgar 19 hrs ago #3
It's part of the Senate's "Minibus" of 3 appropriations bills BumRushDaShow 19 hrs ago #4
Thank you kimbutgar 18 hrs ago #5
They can undo his damage if they choose to then..... Bayard 14 hrs ago #6
This is great news. Martin68 2 hrs ago #7

rampartd

(3,851 posts)
1. stop. they are giving trump money to spend on things he and rfk consider science
Sat Jan 10, 2026, 07:12 PM
20 hrs ago

chemtrails and woo.

SWBTATTReg

(26,057 posts)
2. Good! The worthless POS in the WH knows nothing about the Sciences and he had to be told what nuclear weapons were
Sat Jan 10, 2026, 07:33 PM
20 hrs ago

at or before his first term. I just hope that he passes on a quick natural death, he's asking for it via the stress mouthing off to everybody and his crazy eating habits, lack of any exercise (he doesn't want to exhaust his life force or some POS like that).

I suspect that he's under some sort of IV session on an almost daily routine, it wouldn't surprise me. I noticed that we don't see as much golf scenes, has anyone else noticed if he's still going golfing as much as before?

Breakouts in many scientific areas lead to many other inventions, discoveries, as well as related products/processes due to the new inventions, discoveries/processes. Every little bit. And this is evidenced by the sheer number and volume of economic activities occurring alone in the US. Home of the Computer Age (followed by the Data Networks AOL, Compuserve, etc.).

I almost graduated at the same time the computer age migrated into my first job, computer programmer and then computer training, within 2 years (in '77). And yes, I am old (but not that old) and glad I lived in this particular lifetime, experiencing the full birth and development of the computer age.

It's still growing, maturing, developing into adulthood (the AI phase perhaps). What we got to worry about is when the computers and software decide on their own what to do in some areas. For some areas, that's okay, unlimited thinking got us places. However, bad thinking in some areas didn't help us.

BumRushDaShow

(165,890 posts)
4. It's part of the Senate's "Minibus" of 3 appropriations bills
Sat Jan 10, 2026, 08:54 PM
19 hrs ago

and I *think* was pretty much the same (or is the same) as the House version that passed earlier - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143595309

If he vetoed that, then HE would "shut down" whatever agencies were covered by that "Minibus" (including DOJ, Commerce, and EPA).

Assuming this is the same as the House version, the House had well over enough to override a veto.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Congress Is Reversing Tru...