Members of Congress will be able to view unredacted Epstein files next week

[demmiblue]

Source: NBC News

Members of Congress will be able to begin reviewing the unredacted version of the Department of Justice’s files on Jeffrey Epstein on Monday morning, according to two sources familiar with the DOJ’s plans.

The review process will take place in person at DOJ, according to a letter to members of Congress obtained by NBC News. The members will be able to review the material on computers at the DOJ offices but not review the physical documents themselves.

The letter states that members can review the documents in person, provided they give DOJ 24 hours' notice. The option at this point is only available to members of Congress — and not their staff. They may take notes, but cannot bring in any electronic devices, the letter said.

The review will only be of the 3 million files currently available to the public, not the extensive trove of more than 6 million documents in total that the DOJ says it has in its possession.


Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/members-congress-view-unredacted-epstein-files-monday-rcna257836

[Leghorn21]

1. So will any GQPees take a gander or nah

They’ll wait for their marching orders I suppose…Monday will tell the tale

[TheRickles]

2. Hopefully one or two of the Dems have photographic memories....

[LiberalArkie]

16. or Pornographic memories

[NoRethugFriends]

19. The article says they may take notes

[Maxheader]

3. what?

do the reviewers get a lobotomy afterwards?

[hunter]

4. How the hell does anyone review three million files? How was the indexing done?

Grok?

[drray23]

6. One does not.

Staff can scan through the redacted ones already available and tell their congress person which documents to focus on when unredacted. They are all indexed with a unique ref. Number.

[underpants]

9. Yeah staff would be able to tear through these.

You have a good idea there. I wonder what technology will be available. Will it just be Ctrl F?

[drray23]

12. Of course not.

They have tools for that. It's common when reviewing million of documents as part of a trial discovery. I assume these tools are now augmented with AI to help sort through it.

[hunter]

11. We're still in the bury them with bullshit phase of this administration's defense.

They are still determining which of their own they will throw under the bus.

Andrew the-former-prince was an easy one. Nobody cares about him.

[PSPS]

5. If true, this will be less than half of what they've been hiding

[usonian]

7. Face the camera for an ID check, please.

[FakeNoose]

20. Nevertheless, there WILL be leaks!

[hamsterjill]

8. Can they then report what they find from viewing the files?

Or is this going to be another Feinstein "you wouldn't believe what we saw in there" type of thing?

[William Seger]

10. How many of them will start by searching for themselves, their big donors and their enemies? (nt)

[chicoescuela]

26. Exactly my thoughts. Hope I'm clean.

[intheflow]

13. They can ony view the docs electronically?

NFW. Hard copies must be seen because we all know how much this regime loves creating AI shit and false images. They'll try to pull the same shit with the Fulton County 2020 ballots, mark my words.

[Ford_Prefect]

14. Once more into the breach! IMO those will only cover benign issues like parking tickets in Manhattan. They will skirt

anything of meaningful content, or they will misdirect to other people rather than DJT.

[Evolve Dammit]

15. Such BS. ALL files were ordered to be released in DECEMBER. ALL files. This is Khabuki theatre.

[bluestarone]

17. Confused here. Did the judges order say only release to members of congress

They are really FN with us!!

[Wiz Imp]

28. The law allows for some redactions

Not nearly what the DOJ has actually redacted, but some of theredactions are legitimate and those can not be released to the public(the legitimate redactions are to protect the victims). So it is legit to only allow members of Congress to see unredacted files.

[AnnaLee]

18. If the documents they see were converted to digital form

If the documents, even if currently not editable, were ever in digital editable form, they have had enough time to replace names of the President's friends with other names, including assigning the Clinton's names to events they weren't even around for. Also, for visuals, if you can't have the documents for visuals that aren't in the redacted copies, how does anyone know if they are photoshopped or not? Not even better than nothing in my opinion. Every redacted spot is at the DOJ's replacement.

[FakeNoose]

21. Get ready for the leaks ... probably starting next week

[pfitz59]

22. Not good enough

They need to see source material. Especially photos and videos. Too easy to photoshop.

[oldtime dfl_er]

23. good work being done on reddit

I hope some of the people on Reddit who have been combing thru the files will be able to tell their Congresspeople which files to look at.

[AverageOldGuy]

24. Members of Congress will be able to view unredacted Epstein files next week

I hope everyone will understand that I'm a bit skeptical of this --
-- "unredacted"??? Sure they are.
-- "3 million"??? ROTFLMAO.
-- "next week"??? In which year?

[FakeNoose]

25. Don't question this - accept it

They can and will see the unredacted original files. But there are many catches in this deal.

They can't make copies, or take photos, or email them out. No cellphones will be allowed in the viewing room. They have to view the documents and write down whatever notes they want to make, because that's all they can bring in or take out of the room. How much can they accomplish within these parameters?

Well. a lot ... if they come prepared and if they know where to look.

This weekend, all the congressional staffers will be going through the redacted files, writing down the numbers of the suspicious or likely pages that might have something juicy. Next week the Congressmen/women will use these staffer notes to hone in on the documents that will hopefully provide context and the "juicy gossip" that we all crave.

I'm expecting to get a huge wave of anonymous leaks by Monday afternoon. Or maybe anytime Tuesday.

Be prepared.

[fierywoman]

27. Maybe Aaron Parnas and Ben Meiseles could tell them which pages to look at since they've

been scouring the redacted pages.

[Wiz Imp]

30. Some Democrats need to take notes of as many illegal redactions as they can.

The law only allows redactions to protect victims,not to save other people from embarrassment. It's obvious the DOJ redacted the names of hundreds if not thousands of non-victims. All of those redactions are illegal. Somebody needs to compile a list of as many of those names as possible and read them on the floors of Congress.