Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(39,471 posts)
Sat Feb 7, 2026, 07:41 AM 12 hrs ago

Prosecutors Began Investigating Renee Good's Killing. Washington Told Them to Stop.

Source: NYT

Hours after an immigration agent fatally shot Renee Good inside her S.U.V. on a Minneapolis street last month, a senior federal prosecutor in Minnesota sought a warrant to search the vehicle for evidence in what he expected would be a standard civil rights investigation into the agent’s use of force.

The prosecutor, Joseph H. Thompson, wrote in an email to colleagues that the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, a state agency that specializes in investigating police shootings, would team up with the F.B.I. to determine whether the shooting had been justified and lawful or had violated Ms. Good’s civil rights.

But later that week, as F.B.I. agents equipped with a signed warrant prepared to document blood spatter and bullet holes in Ms. Good’s S.U.V., they received orders to stop, according to several people with knowledge of the events who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

The orders, they said, came from senior officials, including Kash Patel, the F.B.I. director, several of whom worried that pursuing a civil rights investigation — by using a warrant obtained on that basis — would contradict President Trump’s claim that Ms. Good “violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer” who fired at her as she drove her vehicle.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/07/us/renee-good-investigation-minnesota-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.KVA.pAnP.FE6p37Nwd1TA&smid=nytcore-ios-share

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Prosecutors Began Investigating Renee Good's Killing. Washington Told Them to Stop. (Original Post) demmiblue 12 hrs ago OP
With holding evidence is corruption. multigraincracker 11 hrs ago #1
You have too much faith in the American voter and taxpayer. AZLD4Candidate 9 hrs ago #2
"spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly." J_William_Ryan 9 hrs ago #3
Whether she was the instigator or not (she wasn't), all evidence should have been collected and saved. Fla Dem 7 hrs ago #4
Kash Patel, a podcaster selected because of his fierce loyalty to the President, told FBI agents not to investigate. mahatmakanejeeves 6 hrs ago #5
Who has the vehicle? BaronChocula 4 hrs ago #6

multigraincracker

(37,184 posts)
1. With holding evidence is corruption.
Sat Feb 7, 2026, 07:54 AM
11 hrs ago

Makes a good civil case for the family to pursue.
Sometimes civil penalties are greater than criminal penalties to the perpetrators. I’d love to be on that jury.
The FBI, like all other Law Enforcement are corrupted to some extent. The buck always stops at the elected officials that oversee that department. When the tax payers feel the pain, justice will prevail.

AZLD4Candidate

(6,744 posts)
2. You have too much faith in the American voter and taxpayer.
Sat Feb 7, 2026, 09:57 AM
9 hrs ago

Since Reagan's influence, most people only care about themselves. "What's in it for me" was the mantra of the 1980s and it's been carried to its extreme since. Until there is monumental shift to actually caring about people even if it doesn't affect you personally, we will continue to be an narcissistic, nihilistic, psychopathic society. My evidence is the 20 somethings of today who seem to only care about influencers on social media (I'm not going into how that has destroyed empathy and caring in the world) only caring about their own clicks and followers and people living in their own safe space echo chamber.

J_William_Ryan

(3,409 posts)
3. "spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly."
Sat Feb 7, 2026, 10:48 AM
9 hrs ago

This is why it’s pointless to confront Trump Cult members with facts and the truth about the criminal Trump regime.

Fla Dem

(27,488 posts)
4. Whether she was the instigator or not (she wasn't), all evidence should have been collected and saved.
Sat Feb 7, 2026, 12:05 PM
7 hrs ago

Miscarriage of justice.

mahatmakanejeeves

(68,800 posts)
5. Kash Patel, a podcaster selected because of his fierce loyalty to the President, told FBI agents not to investigate.
Sat Feb 7, 2026, 01:41 PM
6 hrs ago

Immunity? Impunity? Does it matter?

Reposted by In The Ancient Libraries of Popehat
https://bsky.app/profile/kenwhite.bsky.social

Don Moynihan
‪@donmoyn.bsky.social‬

Kash Patel, a podcaster selected because of his fierce loyalty to the President, told FBI agents not to investigate the details on Renee Good's shooting because it would contradict the President. Fact matter less than the King's opinion in a personalist regime.

But later that week, as F.B.I. agents equipped with a signed warrant prepared to document blood spatter and bullet holes in Ms. Good’s S.U.V., they received orders to stop, according to several people with knowledge of the events who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

The orders, they said, came from senior officials, including Kash Patel, the F.B.I. director, several of whom worried that pursuing a civil rights investigation — by using a warrant obtained on that basis — would contradict President Trump’s claim that Ms. Good “violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer” who fired at her as she drove her vehicle.
ALT
11:49 AM · Feb 7, 2026

Kash Patel, a podcaster selected because of his fierce loyalty to the President, told FBI agents not to investigate the details on Renee Good's shooting because it would contradict the President. Fact matter less than the King's opinion in a personalist regime.

Don Moynihan (@donmoyn.bsky.social) 2026-02-07T16:49:14.323Z

BaronChocula

(4,188 posts)
6. Who has the vehicle?
Sat Feb 7, 2026, 03:25 PM
4 hrs ago

That's what I'm wondering. Did Patel have it spirited away? Do Hennepin Co. investigators have access to it?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Prosecutors Began Investi...