Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

groundloop

(13,957 posts)
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 03:30 PM 22 hrs ago

Trump to drop his $1.8B 'slush fund' after outrage over paying his allies: report

Source: The Independent

President Donald Trump will reportedly abandon plans for a nearly $1.8 billion compensation fund designed to pay his allies and alleged “victims” of government “weaponization” after federal judges began firing back at a so-called “settlement” that got him off the hook for tax investigations in exchange for funneling millions of taxpayer dollars to his supporters.

A pending decision, according to Axios and Punchbowl, follows a federal court ruling that temporarily blocks the administration from funding or making any payments from what critics have called a “slush fund” to enrich the president’s aggrieved supporters.

The scheme has also come under heavy fire from members of Congress, where lawmakers abruptly abandoned a series of votes before Memorial Day after hitting an impasse over plans to funnel taxpayer dollars into the fund.

Last week, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. blocked the administration from “taking any further action pursuant to the creation or operation of the Anti-Weaponization Fund” — including transferring money to it, considering any claims, and mailing any checks while a legal challenge plays out.

Read more: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-drops-slush-fund-weaponization-payments-b2987528.html

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump to drop his $1.8B 'slush fund' after outrage over paying his allies: report (Original Post) groundloop 22 hrs ago OP
So he gets to keep the money for himself? greatauntoftriplets 22 hrs ago #1
Not unless the judge signs off on it. cstanleytech 22 hrs ago #5
No, it was going to be from an existing "Judgment fund" muriel_volestrangler 20 hrs ago #22
That would violate the Domestic Emoluments Clause. TomSlick 16 hrs ago #41
I'm old enough to remember when that was a thing. Orrex 7 hrs ago #44
I'm old enough to remember a Congress that would enforce it. mdbl 3 hrs ago #48
The perpetual shell game. littlemissmartypants 22 hrs ago #2
We should not get too excited because another grift will happen Deuxcents 22 hrs ago #3
Exactly. He's getting bolder and bolder with his grifts.... groundloop 22 hrs ago #8
Yep. Just like the Iran war market manipulation and all the unregulated prediction market and AI bullshit the regime Karasu 21 hrs ago #15
Every Court where some of that bullshit was filed should hold full evidentiary hearings for fraud Ponietz 22 hrs ago #4
Yup and drum roll.....this might not be something he can claim Presidential immunity to escape. cstanleytech 22 hrs ago #6
Yes He was suing as a private citizen tikka 20 hrs ago #30
But then... GiqueCee 19 hrs ago #32
This message was self-deleted by its author cstanleytech 21 hrs ago #11
I doubt this is the end. twodogsbarking 22 hrs ago #7
we need to watch carefully to prevent him from transferring money to those J6ers BlueWaveNeverEnd 21 hrs ago #16
will this also kill his IRS get out of jail free card? eggplant 22 hrs ago #9
heckuva good question! rurallib 21 hrs ago #10
Yes. There is no settement because there was never a legitimate case. The whole thing was a fraud on the court Wiz Imp 21 hrs ago #13
Only if the courts stop it ThoughtCriminal 20 hrs ago #24
A very good chance that the slush fund was intentional rage bait that VTderry 12 hrs ago #43
Apparently a separate issue..... reACTIONary 19 hrs ago #35
This was such a blatant theft that even some of the republicans in Congress were against it. patphil 21 hrs ago #12
It's already taking place Akakoji 21 hrs ago #19
Notice nothing said about his supposed tax immunity nakocal 21 hrs ago #14
yes Skittles 21 hrs ago #17
That's what Trump really wanted, a 'Get Out Of Jail Free' card from the IRS, so his family's criminal organization sop 20 hrs ago #31
This was said.... reACTIONary 19 hrs ago #33
Yes Dog Walkers Rock 17 hrs ago #37
Get them to court! Akakoji 21 hrs ago #18
Good, this should piss off the inbred MAGAts who thought they were going to get fat stacks Aviation Pro 20 hrs ago #20
MAGAts got owned by the judge. Dr. T 20 hrs ago #27
Democrats would be correct to not trust or believe someone as dishonest and corrupt as Trump. J_William_Ryan 20 hrs ago #21
"Allies" hibbing 20 hrs ago #23
Maybe he called John Roberts. JohnnyRingo 20 hrs ago #25
This blew up massively in his Stoopid face underpants 19 hrs ago #34
I thought it should have been $1.933 Bengus81 7 hrs ago #45
You aren't thinking like him. JohnnyRingo 5 hrs ago #46
"Purely about him". JohnnyRingo 4 hrs ago #47
More appropriate headline title:"Trump to drop his $1.8B slush fund to pay those who stormed the capitol on Jan 6th" n/t iluvtennis 20 hrs ago #26
To pay domestic terrorists. Dave Bowman 20 hrs ago #28
.. that's the right descriptor. 🙏 iluvtennis 17 hrs ago #38
That just means he'll find another way to channel Figarosmom 20 hrs ago #29
Excellent! Fuck you Donny! Initech 18 hrs ago #36
There are a lot of maga hissy fits right now, I'm sure. C Moon 16 hrs ago #39
It is the thing that will not die. They will reconstitute it in another form when they think they can slip it by. Ford_Prefect 16 hrs ago #40
Trump is counting on the Republicans lightening up on this if they hold Congress in November. LudwigPastorius 15 hrs ago #42

muriel_volestrangler

(106,683 posts)
22. No, it was going to be from an existing "Judgment fund"
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 05:47 PM
20 hrs ago
Earlier this week, the Justice Department announced that Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche had established a $1.776 billion dollar fund, ostensibly as part of a settlement agreement in Trump v. IRS. The fund—drawn entirely from the federal Judgment Fund, a permanent congressional appropriation used to pay court settlements against the United States—will be used to dispense taxpayer money to people who suffered from purported Democratic “weaponization” and “lawfare.” While Trump is not expected to receive compensation from the fund himself, money will be doled out by a five-member board he effectively controls, operating under procedures that need not be disclosed, with the identities of recipients potentially kept secret.

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-president-who-sued-himself

TomSlick

(13,099 posts)
41. That would violate the Domestic Emoluments Clause.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 09:46 PM
16 hrs ago

(Art. II, § 1, cl. 7): “The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.”

mdbl

(8,825 posts)
48. I'm old enough to remember a Congress that would enforce it.
Tue Jun 2, 2026, 11:18 AM
3 hrs ago

No such Congress exists today.

Deuxcents

(27,856 posts)
3. We should not get too excited because another grift will happen
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 03:38 PM
22 hrs ago

Keep vigilant and don’t think this is the end of the slush fund until it IS the end of it. Now, for that four letter word.. NEXT

groundloop

(13,957 posts)
8. Exactly. He's getting bolder and bolder with his grifts....
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 03:58 PM
22 hrs ago

And he's not about to stop.

Karasu

(2,142 posts)
15. Yep. Just like the Iran war market manipulation and all the unregulated prediction market and AI bullshit the regime
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 04:58 PM
21 hrs ago

loves so much.

The grift NEVER ends.

Ponietz

(4,465 posts)
4. Every Court where some of that bullshit was filed should hold full evidentiary hearings for fraud
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 03:50 PM
22 hrs ago

Voluntarily abandoning one’s own fraud scheme does not absolve one from responsibility.

cstanleytech

(28,630 posts)
6. Yup and drum roll.....this might not be something he can claim Presidential immunity to escape.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 03:54 PM
22 hrs ago

tikka

(852 posts)
30. Yes He was suing as a private citizen
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 06:21 PM
20 hrs ago

I just hope the judge follows up on the fraud investigation

GiqueCee

(4,891 posts)
32. But then...
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 06:29 PM
19 hrs ago

... the judge's family will get doxxed and threatened, because that's Trump's MO. He 's an asshole, but he's possessed of just enough simian cleverness to keep himself one step removed from direct responsibility. That's what Charles Manson thought, too.

Response to Ponietz (Reply #4)

Wiz Imp

(10,556 posts)
13. Yes. There is no settement because there was never a legitimate case. The whole thing was a fraud on the court
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 04:52 PM
21 hrs ago

which the judge in Florida already picked up on. She required Trump to explain how it wasnt a fraud, which ressulted in him dropping the slush fund altogether - a blatant admission it was a fraud all the time. He'll try other things for sure, but the whole IRS lawsuit was a massive FAIL and he will not get anything out of it.

ThoughtCriminal

(14,761 posts)
24. Only if the courts stop it
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 05:59 PM
20 hrs ago

My understanding is that Trump is only dropping the slush fund. I think the part barring the IRS from investigating him, his family or their businesses is WAY more important to him. I think he's hoping that by just saying "Screw the henchmen", will cool the outrage and that provision will somehow survive.

VTderry

(141 posts)
43. A very good chance that the slush fund was intentional rage bait that
Tue Jun 2, 2026, 01:38 AM
12 hrs ago

he would eventually agree to "drop" --- while the tax fraud free pass remained in place for him and his wretched family.

reACTIONary

(7,330 posts)
35. Apparently a separate issue.....
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 06:42 PM
19 hrs ago
Another federal judge is also investigating the so-called “settlement” agreement between the president and the IRS after Trump sued his own administration for $10 billion. The judge will determine whether Trump filed a “frivolous lawsuit for the sole purpose of forcing a settlement” to create a fund for his political allies while the president, his family and their businesses escape government scrutiny for tax debts over which they have been under investigation for more than a decade.

patphil

(9,257 posts)
12. This was such a blatant theft that even some of the republicans in Congress were against it.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 04:49 PM
21 hrs ago

Not a good idea, especially in an election year; it couldn't be around during the actual campaigns in Sept./Oct., or the Democrats would have the perfect attack ads.
Poor Donnie, and he was so looking forward to skimming a huge pile of cash off the top. I bet if he had succeeded in setting up the fund that most of it would have gone to himself and his family.

Watch for a new, and less conspicuous, massive raid on the Treasury after the election.

nakocal

(629 posts)
14. Notice nothing said about his supposed tax immunity
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 04:56 PM
21 hrs ago

And the dropping of the $100 million owed in back taxes.

sop

(19,527 posts)
31. That's what Trump really wanted, a 'Get Out Of Jail Free' card from the IRS, so his family's criminal organization
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 06:22 PM
20 hrs ago

never has to pay back taxes, or be audited again. He probably thinks people will forget about that illegal agreement if he gives up the $1.776 billion.

reACTIONary

(7,330 posts)
33. This was said....
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 06:40 PM
19 hrs ago
Another federal judge is also investigating the so-called “settlement” agreement between the president and the IRS after Trump sued his own administration for $10 billion. The judge will determine whether Trump filed a “frivolous lawsuit for the sole purpose of forcing a settlement” to create a fund for his political allies while the president, his family and their businesses escape government scrutiny for tax debts over which they have been under investigation for more than a decade.

Akakoji

(577 posts)
18. Get them to court!
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 05:19 PM
21 hrs ago

He has been called on his bulkshit so now he must go back to court and explain how his suit that the DOJ agreed to drop was valid in the first place. Then, he should get fined 1 777 million.

Aviation Pro

(15,813 posts)
20. Good, this should piss off the inbred MAGAts who thought they were going to get fat stacks
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 05:29 PM
20 hrs ago

Next up, that IRS immunity that will be laughed out of court.

How's it feel to get fucked, you child raping fuckwad?

J_William_Ryan

(3,611 posts)
21. Democrats would be correct to not trust or believe someone as dishonest and corrupt as Trump.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 05:30 PM
20 hrs ago

Trump’s illegal thug fund is completely unwarranted – no one was a ‘victim’ of DOJ prosecution, particularly Trump’s J6 domestic terrorists.

hibbing

(10,619 posts)
23. "Allies"
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 05:47 PM
20 hrs ago

You mean all the convicted criminals that attacked Cogress? Those allies? All the convicted criminals you already pardoned? Those allies? You mean all the Proud Boys your whole administration coddles? You mean those allies?

JohnnyRingo

(21,052 posts)
25. Maybe he called John Roberts.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 06:08 PM
20 hrs ago

Most certainly WH council can apprise him of how weak his case is, but I don't think he would find an ally on the SC either. It's just too far over the line to sneak it through.

Trump hates "losing" so bad he throws in the towel and blames someone or acts like he wasn't serious.

underpants

(197,390 posts)
34. This blew up massively in his Stoopid face
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 06:41 PM
19 hrs ago

He thought the $1.776 number was cute.

Different Presidents have had big projects but they were sold as having a benefit for all. This are are purely about him. People don’t like that, regardless of what they say, but throwing BILLIONS and MILLIONS around pisses everyone off.

Bengus81

(10,422 posts)
45. I thought it should have been $1.933
Tue Jun 2, 2026, 07:13 AM
7 hrs ago

Seems more appropriate as to how this Country is being run

JohnnyRingo

(21,052 posts)
47. "Purely about him".
Tue Jun 2, 2026, 09:33 AM
4 hrs ago

I don't believe one dime of this "settlement" was going to anyone not named Trump or Kushner.

Since the amount of payout, and the person(s) receiving it are cleverly ruled to be secret, he can pretend some of it went to poor beleaguered patriots who were wronged by the previous administration while he pockets every cent. "No president has been wronged like me".

He's not one known for sharing.

iluvtennis

(21,537 posts)
26. More appropriate headline title:"Trump to drop his $1.8B slush fund to pay those who stormed the capitol on Jan 6th" n/t
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 06:15 PM
20 hrs ago

Ford_Prefect

(8,678 posts)
40. It is the thing that will not die. They will reconstitute it in another form when they think they can slip it by.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 09:38 PM
16 hrs ago

LudwigPastorius

(15,105 posts)
42. Trump is counting on the Republicans lightening up on this if they hold Congress in November.
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 10:37 PM
15 hrs ago

He knows what it means to take a performative stance against something to win an election, then immediately reversing yourself.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump to drop his $1.8B '...