Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(173,429 posts)
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 05:10 PM 11 hrs ago

Fence around Eugene Federal Building must be removed within 48 hours, judge rules

Source: The Oregonian

Updated: Jun. 23, 2026, 7:58 a.m.|Published: Jun. 22, 2026, 1:17 p.m.


A federal judge on Monday ruled that a tall metal fence around the perimeter of the Eugene Federal Building violates the public’s right to free speech and assembly by blocking access to an upper courtyard that has for decades served as a focal point for local protests. “There is a long tradition and history of using the upper space for both quiet vigils and also to express thoughts and opinions to the government agencies that are housed there,” U.S. District Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai ruled from the bench.

The judge said he understands the vital need to protect the downtown building’s employees and property from riots. But he said: “I’m not convinced that the placement of the fencing here is really designed for the purposes of improvement of the building, but really to eliminate the use of the space by the public when exercising their First Amendment rights.”

At first, Kasubhai said he wouldn’t order removal of the fencing but said the government must reconfigure it in a way that allows the public to use the upper courtyard while still safeguarding the building and its workers. But by the end of Monday, when the government couldn’t provide a time frame for meeting the judge’s wishes, Kasubhai ordered the government to remove the fence within 48 hours.

He said the government still could place a much less restrictive fence that hugs the breezeway of the building on its own timeline without blocking public access to the upper courtyard. He also rejected a government proposal to allow demonstrations in the upper plaza only with a permit.

Read more: https://www.oregonlive.com/crime/2026/06/fence-around-eugene-federal-building-violates-free-speech-rights-judge-says.html



Link to Civil Liberties Defense Center PRESS RELEASE - Civil Liberties Defense Center Announces Resounding Win in Federal Free Speech Plaza Lawsuit
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fence around Eugene Federal Building must be removed within 48 hours, judge rules (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 11 hrs ago OP
When is a judge going to order the Kennedy tarp removed? Bluetus 10 hrs ago #1
Good work by Civil Liberties Defense Center OutNow 10 hrs ago #2
Trump hates Americans, and he hates our constitution Walleye 10 hrs ago #3
Remove it within 48 hours, or else what? TheRickles 9 hrs ago #4
There have been financial sanctions levied on DHS/DOJ lawyers BumRushDaShow 8 hrs ago #5
I didn't know that - thanks. Have any of the lawyers actually paid up, or do they let those sanctions drag on as well? TheRickles 7 hrs ago #6

OutNow

(918 posts)
2. Good work by Civil Liberties Defense Center
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 05:47 PM
10 hrs ago

The CLDC is a firm based here in Eugene where I live. I'm a financial supporter. While the CLDC fights for justice in cases all over the country, I know they're always ready to help us in local cases too.

Walleye

(45,809 posts)
3. Trump hates Americans, and he hates our constitution
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 05:59 PM
10 hrs ago

I really am wondering if he’s actually American. Make him prove his citizenship, like he wants everybody else to have to do.

TheRickles

(3,573 posts)
4. Remove it within 48 hours, or else what?
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 07:13 PM
9 hrs ago

That seems to be a favored R tactic now, to simply ignore judicial orders. And it's hard to see what can directly counter that. One indirect approach would be to have the appropriate State Bar Associations initiate action against the lawyers involved (censure, disbarment, etc.), but that takes a lot of time.

BumRushDaShow

(173,429 posts)
5. There have been financial sanctions levied on DHS/DOJ lawyers
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 07:46 PM
8 hrs ago

I have posted a few in LBN but can't get them all as many have been done associated with thousands of smaller (mostly immigration) cases that are not picked up by national news but are reported on local news outlets.

TheRickles

(3,573 posts)
6. I didn't know that - thanks. Have any of the lawyers actually paid up, or do they let those sanctions drag on as well?
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 09:15 PM
7 hrs ago
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Fence around Eugene Feder...