Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(81,884 posts)
Wed Jan 28, 2026, 03:51 AM Wednesday

Bill to ban paid petitioning fails in South Dakota House of Representatives

Constitutional concerns helped tank a bill Tuesday in the South Dakota House of Representatives that aimed to ban payments to petition circulators in ballot measure campaigns.

Rep. Travis Ismay, R-Newell, sponsored House Bill 1087. It sought to bar payments for those who want to put initiated laws, referendums or constitutional amendments on the ballot.

Ismay argued that paying circulators undermines the interests of South Dakotans by allowing out-of-state interests to fund campaigns meant to change the state.

Circulators need 17,508 signatures from registered voters to propose a law or challenge a bill passed by the Legislature. They need 35,017 to put a constitutional amendment on the ballot.



https://southdakotasearchlight.com/briefs/bill-to-ban-paid-petitioning-fails-in-south-dakota-house-of-representatives/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bill to ban paid petitioning fails in South Dakota House of Representatives (Original Post) RandySF Wednesday OP
Not surprised. How much astroturf referendums got their boost Vogon_Glory Wednesday #1

Vogon_Glory

(10,218 posts)
1. Not surprised. How much astroturf referendums got their boost
Wed Jan 28, 2026, 08:06 AM
Wednesday

Using paid petition-gatherers?

Can you say “Tea Party”?

Sure you can!

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»South Dakota»Bill to ban paid petition...