Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Exchange between Bill Clinton and New Mexico Resident Illustrates Deceptive Framing of Key Issues [View all]cui bono
(19,926 posts)34. That's what you would like, but then he would not be answering the question.
He wasn't asked who he planned to vote for. Seems you just want to label him prior to hearing his opinions which leads you to then listen to what he says with a preconceived notion in mind. Objectivity requires one to actually listen to what someone says and digest it and decide whether their points have any merit on their own, regardless of what "team" they're on.
Politics as a team sport is one of the reasons our election process is in such disarray. The "news" treats it as a team sport as well and because of that we don't hear the issues, we just get play by play action reporting.
.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Exchange between Bill Clinton and New Mexico Resident Illustrates Deceptive Framing of Key Issues [View all]
Baobab
May 2016
OP
Democratic Party did so much better with the policies of FDR, holding majorities in Congress for
highprincipleswork
May 2016
#2
Why do you insist on promoting the same myth ... over, and over, again ...
1StrongBlackMan
May 2016
#4
While what you say is true, it doesn't negate the fact that ALL people are doing worse after
cui bono
Jun 2016
#8
I assume PoC benefitted in the end from Social Security and Medicare and numerous other programs
highprincipleswork
Jun 2016
#9
No one is saying ending or diluting these programs; but, if you haven't heard of ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#14
There is talk about PoC being the most rational of all this year, and I hate to say it, but
highprincipleswork
Jun 2016
#15
I never saw it until you constantly used it to smear Bernie. But let's drop that.
cui bono
Jun 2016
#20
Yes ... Let's move to you making up stuff I didn't say, nor, have ever thought ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2016
#22
You didn't address anything I said and now you are pretty much calling me a liar.
cui bono
Jun 2016
#23
I'm not an economic primacy advocate. I advocate for everything as I have just said in my posts
cui bono
Jun 2016
#31
We cannot have another NewDeal today, all of the things done are against international private law.
Baobab
Jun 2016
#25
First of all, look at the chart and you will see that what I am promoting in this post is no myth -
highprincipleswork
Jun 2016
#10
Q: What happened? What did you ask? And were you satisfied with President Clinton’s responses, Josh?
oberliner
Jun 2016
#33
Again though, there's no reason to start that way. It shouldn't matter unless one wants to prejudge
cui bono
Jun 2016
#38
Under Clinton at least within the Federal government, Affirmative Action and Equal Employment
Jitter65
Jun 2016
#11
Which means what exactly? Is it that he found Bill's answers validate everything you've read here
AtomicKitten
Jun 2016
#30