Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Hakeem Jeffries won't commit to blocking additional Iran war funding [View all]GenThePerservering
(3,405 posts)3. "We'll cross that bridge when we come to it"?
What bridge would that be? There is no justification.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
10 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hakeem Jeffries won't commit to blocking additional Iran war funding [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Mar 8
OP
Ah! A re-tread of the "Why don't you go get a job at the DOJ and tell them what to do?"
Scrivener7
Mar 9
#52
No it isn't. It's a response to the mistaken claim that "we put Jeffries in power".
lapucelle
Mar 9
#55
Folks should never assume that what they don't know, the public does not know as well.
lapucelle
Mar 8
#38
Ahh! A re-tread of the "We don't know what we don't know. The DOJ doesn't leak!" argument from the Garland days.
Scrivener7
Mar 9
#57
Do you think you haven't been clear you think Jeffries is doing all that can be done, and do you
Scrivener7
Mar 9
#64
Jeffries understands well the possibility of winning some Republican votes to our side.
lapucelle
Mar 8
#9
I want to hear Dems expressing outrage that #rump has no "compelling rationale"
William Seger
Mar 8
#8
It's right there in the first four minutes of the Welker interview with Jeffries this morning.
lapucelle
Mar 8
#11
WTF is wrong with these people? Just once I'd like to hear an answer that isn't the weakest possible response.
Scrivener7
Mar 8
#29
More money? Yeah, not for this one but for the NEXT one,and then the NEXT one......
Bengus81
Mar 8
#31
You know, I'm getting pretty disenchanted with these institutionalists. We need CHANGE. n/t
PatrickforB
Mar 8
#42
While he's at it, he can get some pointers from Schumer about writing a strongly-worded letter nt
Rob H.
Mar 8
#43
Please tape or staple these instructions on the tip of Jeffries' and Schumer's noses
ScubaDave
Mar 9
#49