Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

bigtree's Journal
bigtree's Journal
March 28, 2026

NK protest in my relatively small town a couple times larger than the last one

...ours began as a rally at the local music pavilion grounds and spilled out to the street in front and beyond.

Many thanks to everyone who rallied today!

..slideshow: (wait for it)


March 27, 2026

Trump: "Fire, boom, fire boom"

Headquarters @HQNewsNow 5m
Trump: People think you can take those big rockets and throw them out your window like when you were a child with the paper airplanes, it doesn't work that way

Headquarters @HQNewsNow 8m
Trump: You have to see it. It's very cool. Missiles launched, missiles launched, missiles launching. They're launching. Then at 7 seconds, fire, fire, fire. Fire, boom, fire boom


https://x.com/HQNewsNow/status/2037651167400829271


March 27, 2026

Rick Steves: "Know people before you bomb them"

Even though travel writer Rick Steves is best known for his guide books about Europe, he's no stranger to the Middle East. He first traveled to the region in 1978, when he was 23, and then returned to Iran in 2009 for an episode of his PBS show.

In a conversation with Death, Sex & Money host Anna Sale, Rick explains why he made that episode and why it's important get an up-close look at a country the U.S. is attacking: "It's real people, and if 150 little school girls were killed in our country, life would grind to a halt, but if we do it in their country it's just collateral damage."

watch:



(excerpt)

...one thing it's interesting when I when I look at those plumes of ugly toxic black clouds coming out of cities in Iran, I think of the cultural heritage, the pre the the treasures of their culture.

When I was in Iran, people (in the U.S.) were singing bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran like it was a a Beach Boy song, you know, and they were talking about a regime change, like it was a game. Um, we don't know the political baggage. We don't know the the mindset of our enemies a lot of times. Um, and I strive to know what is there. What are their 911s? You know, what what makes them respond to the rest of the world? And in Iran, it's incursions from the West...

Um, and I was almost I was traumatized as a TV producer at the great museum in Tehran with how skimpy the artifacts were. Where are all of your treasures? Where's Xerxes? You know, where's Cyrus? Where's the the great empires of Persia? And they go, all of our finest artifacts are in Europe in great museums in Europe. So, you can go there to see them. And they've been taken elsewhere.

And uh what's going on in Iran right now? They've got a a theocratic dictatorship. Why was that?Because in 1953 they elected a charismatic local leader um Mosedc to to run their country and nationalize their oil.

Can you imagine that? They they took control of their own oil and that person was thrown out by the United States and Britain because we needed access to their oil. And we put in a puppet, a guy who played ball with us on our terms and that was the Shah.

And uh the shah was great if you're a cosmopolitan big city Iranian with lots of money and and uh and connections with Europe, but that was the worst thing that could happen for a lot of Iranians because he was an affront to their values. They were bragging the miniskirts were shorter in Tehran than they were in Paris. Imagine that. We've got shorter miniskirts in Thran. We're so western. We're so hip. What is that? How does that resonate with the small town less educated fundamentalists?

The base, you know, and the base of Iran is the same of the base in our country right now. And they're good people, but they're they're riddled with fear and they're motivated by love and they've got a worldview and they've got baggage and uh their baggage is the shah and and they don't want another sha. So they've chosen this um m Muslim revolution, this Islamic lack of democracy because it's an alternative to the shah.

And we got to understand that. I can't fully understand that, but I know that mothers voted for the the religious takeover because they didn't want the alternative. And if an Americans were putting a person on the throne in Tehran, their girls would be hijacked from a moral point of view. They would be boy toys, crash materialists, and drug addicts. That's what they're worried about.

Uh I had a woman, I I've talked about it in my writing quite a bit, came up to me and said, "Are you an American journalist?" I said, "Yes." She said, "I want you to go home and tell the truth. We're strong. We're united, and we just don't want our little girls to be raised like Britney Spears.

And I thought, whoa, I've I've hit on something here. They're not worried about the the price of oil. They're worried about the ethics and the morality of their children. And they don't want this western hedonism. They want this very conservative, beautiful in their mind Muslim um lifestyle. And um it's a different world and we don't appreciate that and and we need to.



Rick Steves' Iran (2009)

Join Rick as he explores the most surprising and fascinating land he's ever visited: Iran. In this one-hour, ground-breaking travel special, you'll discover the splendid monuments of Iran's rich and glorious past, learn more about the 20th-century story of this perplexing nation, and experience Iranian life today in its historic capital and in a countryside village. Most important, you'll meet the people of this nation whose government so exasperates our own.

watch:


March 27, 2026

After weeks of refusing, Republicans caved to Dem demands to fund DHS without a blank check for ICE and CBP.

Chuck Schumer @SenSchumer 1h
After weeks of negotiations, Republicans caved to our demands to fund DHS without a blank check for ICE and CBP.

My full statement below:




House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries appeared on MS NOW’s The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell, where he emphasized that while the Trump administration is brutalizing American citizens and entering a reckless war of choice, House Democrats remain committed to making life more affordable for the American people.

LEADER JEFFRIES: Yes, you know, what’s interesting, Lawrence, in their One Big Ugly Bill, which, of course, ripped away Medicaid from at least 14 million Americans and literally took food from the mouths of hungry children, seniors and veterans because of the fact that they enacted the largest cut to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance in American history. They gave $191 billion to DHS. 10 billion of that can be used any way that Donald Trump and the Department of Homeland Security wants. And so over the last 41 days, effectively, Donald Trump has chosen not to pay TSA when ordering Republicans to shut down the Department of Homeland Security. And so he’s always had this ability, but clearly he wanted to hold TSA agents and the American people hostage across the country while creating chaos at airports, trying to get Democrats to back away from our position.

House and Senate Democrats over the last several weeks have repeatedly made clear that we need to reopen every other aspect of the Department of Homeland Security, TSA and FEMA and the Coast Guard and our cybersecurity professionals, every other aspect of the Department of Homeland Security, other than, of course, ICE, which needs to be brought under control. And we’ve also made clear we are not going to fund Donald Trump’s extreme and violent mass deportation machine. But Republicans who control the House, the Senate and the presidency made the determination that they want to hold TSA agents hostage and forced them for weeks now to work without pay when Donald Trump at any point over the last 41 days could have made clear that they need to get paid. Thankfully, we’ve now compelled him to do just that.

Donald Trump has said, don’t do anything. We’re dealing with an affordability crisis in the United States of America. We’ve got this reckless war of choice that we’ve got to end, that Donald Trump has gotten into. They’re spending billions of dollars to drop bombs in the Middle East, but are unwilling to spend a dime to actually make life more affordable for the American people. And then on top of all of that, he’s trying to jam the so-called SAVE America Act down the throats of the American people. This is voter suppression on steroids, and it doesn’t have the pass—votes to pass the Senate, and of course, in the House, was strongly opposed by Democrats, and we will continue to do so. We’re going to do everything we need to do to make sure, Lawrence, that there’s a free and fair election in November. And when that happens, Democrats are taking back control of the House of Representatives, and Senate Democrats are on a path to do the same thing.

Effectively, he was saying, I don’t really care about the hardship that is being inflicted on the American people. We’ve seen gas prices are skyrocketing out of control in an environment where people are already struggling to live paycheck to paycheck. Many Americans can’t thrive and can barely survive. Donald Trump could care less about it, and he said that in his own words today from the White House. At the same period of time, apparently, he could care less about the fact that thousands of troops are being put into harm’s way in this reckless war of choice. And American lives, heroes, patriots, have already lost their lives up until this point. And yet, Donald Trump doesn’t care.

https://jeffries.house.gov/2026/03/26/leader-jeffries-on-ms-now-donald-trump-at-any-point-over-the-last41-days-could-have-made-clearthat-tsa-needs-to-get-paid/
March 26, 2026

18 U.S. Code § 592



x.com/CREWcrew/status/2037266054007734657

18 U.S. Code § 592 states that any officer of the Army or Navy, or any person in the civil, military, or naval service of the United States, who orders, brings, keeps, or has under their control any troops or armed men at a location where a general or special election is held, commits a crime unless such force is necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States. Violators may be fined, imprisoned for up to five years, or both, and are disqualified from holding any office of honor, profit, or trust under the United States.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/592


___Deployment is only lawful if it is necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States. Routine law enforcement or maintaining order is not a valid justification.
March 26, 2026

This is what tinpot dictatorships do. Trump and his cohorts have packed DOJ to obstruct justice

...having successfully blocked ongoing prosecutions of Donald Trump in his term, at his direction, they've now taken to bragging about it.

Acyn @Acyn
Blanche: When it comes to the FBI… Director Patel has cleaned house there too. There is not a single man or woman with a gun, federal agent, still in that organization that had anything to do with the prosecution of President Trump.

President Trump for the first time in modern history has said I am the president and if you work in the executive branch, you work for me. And guess what? We can all read the constitution. He's right. And unfortunately, past administrations, Republican included, have just resigned themselves to putting up with partisan actors within the DOJ. We do not.


https://x.com/Acyn/status/2037219967779955144


SC Jack Smith made this clear:

"The throughline of all of Mr. Trump's criminal efforts was deceit — knowingly false claims of election fraud — and the evidence shows that Mr. Trump used these lies as a weapon to defeat a federal government function foundational to the United States' democratic process," the report states.



Though Smith sought to salvage the indictment, the team dismissed it in November because of longstanding Justice Department policy that says sitting presidents cannot face federal prosecution.

"The Department's view that the Constitution prohibits the continued indictment and prosecution of a President is categorical and does not turn on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the Government's proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the Office stands fully behind," the report states. "Indeed, but for Mr. Trump's election and imminent return to the Presidency, the Office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial."

The report is unsparing in its details about schemes undertaken by Trump to undo the presidential contest, accusing him of an "unprecedented criminal effort to overturn the legitimate results of the election in order to retain power."

It recounts his role in trying to force the Justice Department to use its law enforcement authorities to advance his personal interests, participating in a scheme to enlist fake electors in battleground states won by Biden and having directed "an angry mob to the United States Capitol to obstruct the congressional certification of the presidential election and then leverage rioters' violence to further delay it."

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-the-full-special-counsel-report-on-trumps-jan-6-actions


Former Jan. 6 prosecutor and ex-DOJ employees sue Trump administration over firings
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/former-jan-6-prosecutor-doj-employees-sue-trump-administration-firing-rcna220386

'Psychological terrorism': Ex-DOJ officials sue the Trump administration, claiming they were fired for their work on Jan. 6 cases
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/i-knew-why-fired-jan-6-doj-officials-sue-trump-administration-over-terminations-with-no-explanation/

March 25, 2026

House GOP grumbling for the cameras about today's DoD Iran briefing

"...what I conveyed to them at the end of this hearing, is this has consequences if you don't remedy it," Mike Rogers told reporters.



Politico:

Top Republican attacks Pentagon for not providing details on Iran

The House Armed Services Committee chair said the department owes lawmakers more information about the administration’s plans for U.S. troops in the Middle East.

House Armed Services Committee chair Rep. Mike Rogers said members warned defense officials that troop movements in the region should be “thoughtful and deliberate.” They also made it clear the administration isn’t offering details on American efforts in the U.S. campaign, dubbed Operation Epic Fury.

“We want to know more about what’s going on, what the options are, and why they’re being considered,” the Alabama lawmaker said. “And we’re just not getting enough answers on those questions.”

It’s a notable rebuke from a senior GOP defense hawk who has backed President Donald Trump’s decision to attack Iran — and a warning that the administration could lose support for the nearly month-old war if it can’t adequately make the case to Congress.

“That’s what I conveyed to them at the end of this hearing, is this has consequences if you don’t remedy it,” Rogers told reporters.

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/25/rogers-attacks-pentagon-iran-troops-00844639


March 25, 2026

Newly released case records show Jack Smith found Trump had a business motive for keeping classified documents

Ana Cabrera @AnaCabrera
NEW: Trump had business motive for keeping classified documents, Jack Smith finds

The special counsel’s team found Donald Trump held onto documents so secret only six people could legally review them — and believed his reason for doing so was personal financial gain.



Mar. 25, 2026, 5:00 AM EDT
by Carol Leonnig and Jacqueline Alemany

___Special counsel Jack Smith gathered evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump took many top secret documents that related to his worldwide business interests, and investigators considered this a likely motive for Trump concealing them at his Florida club after he left the White House, according to newly released case records.

The special prosecutor also had evidence indicating that after leaving office Trump had shown a classified map to passengers on a private plane, including his future chief of staff, Susie Wiles, and took at least one document that was so secret that only six people had authority to review it, according to a memo reviewed by MS NOW and cited by the House Judiciary Committee’s ranking Democrat, Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland.

In a January 2023 “progress memo” reviewed by MS NOW, Smith’s office discussed the possible motive after the FBI discovered that Trump held on to many documents related to his businesses.

“Trump possessed classified documents pertinent to his business interests — establishing a motive for retaining them,” according to the memo, which tracked progress in the documents and election-interference investigations. “We must have those documents.”

read more: https://www.ms.now/news/trump-classified-documents-smith-investigation-business-motive


___The disclosure, made to the House Judiciary Committee as part of its investigation into the probes into Trump, offers new details about the types of records the president took with him to Florida after losing the 2020 election.

The files shared with Congress include a January 2023 memo of work on Smith’s team. Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) also shared them on Tuesday.

In it, agents are seen discussing the need to secure permission to show the classified documents at trial, arguing that Trump’s business interest in the documents indicates his motive, while the closely held documents show the highly sensitive nature of the materials. The memo does not provide further specifics about the contents of the classified documents.

“Most damning is what these documents, cherry-picked by your own DOJ for disclosure, show about President Trump’s conduct,” Raskin wrote in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, going to quote from the memo from Smith’s team.

The “FBI has also found that certain classified documents President Trump improperly retained ‘would be pertinent to certain business interests.’ DOJ prosecutors further assessed that these ‘classified documents pertinent to his business interests’ established ‘a motive for retaining them,” Raskin wrote.

“The memorandum further specifies that the disclosure of these documents represented ‘an aggravated potential harm to national security.’ The prosecutors also wrote that these were ‘highly sensitive documents—the type of documents that only presidents and officials with the most sensitive authority have.’ One ‘particularly sensitive document was accessible by only 6? people, including the president.’”

At another point in the memo, prosecutors discuss Trump showing a classified map to passengers traveling with him aboard a flight, including his now chief of staff Susie Wiles.

https://thehill.com/homenews/5799507-trump-classified-documents-mar-a-lago-smith-memo/

Raskin letter to Bondi: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/27905007-2026-03-24-raskin-to-bondi-doj-re-classified-docs/

March 24, 2026The Honorable Pamela J. BondiAttorney GeneralU.S. Department of Justice950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20530Attorney General Bondi:

We have long known that, as he left office in 2021, President Donald Trump stole classified documents, hoarded them in the ballrooms and bathrooms of his Mar-a-Lago clubhouse, defied subpoenas, and obstructed law enforcement. One lingering question has been: why? Why would Donald Trump go to such extraordinary lengths to steal classified documents, hoard them, and refuse to return them? Together with Donald Trump, your Department of Justice (DOJ) has been fighting tooth and nail to gag Special Counsel Jack Smith and bury his report in order to cover-up the answer to this key question.

For the past year, DOJ has been working with Republicans of the House Judiciary Committee to wage a campaign of retribution against career prosecutors and federal agents who did their duty, followed the facts and the law, and investigated Donald Trump both for conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and for hiding and lying about the classified documents he stole. As part of this effort, DOJ earlier this month produced yet another set of cherry-picked documents relating to Jack Smith’s Arctic Frost and Plasmic Echo investigations. Apparently blinded by the frenzied search to find any scrap of evidence that could be twisted and distorted to level an attack against Special Counsel Smith (despite constantly coming up empty-handed), you have, quite amazingly, missed the fact that some of the documents you provided include damning evidence about your boss’s conduct and may well violate the gag order your DOJ and Donald Trump demanded from Judge Aileen Cannon.

These new disclosures suggest that Donald Trump stole documents so sensitive that only six people in the entire U.S. government had access to them, that the documents President Trump stole pertained to his business interests, and that Susie Wiles, then the CEO of Donald Trump’s super PAC, witnessed President Trump showing off a classifiedmap to passengers on his private plane. This glimpse into the trove of evidence behind the coverup reveals a President of the United States who may have sold out our national security to enrich himself.

When Special Counsel Smith and his deputies appeared before Congress, they could not answer this Committee’s questions about the classified documents case, under threat of potential federal prosecution, because of the gag order Judge Cannon issued at the request of Donald Trump. Judge Cannon’s Protective Order broadly prevents the “[d]isclosure to the Public” of any discovery materials or “any information derived there from.” Mr. Smith’s authorization letter from DOJ expressly prohibited him from discussing “Volume II of the Special Counsel’s report, and any information or conclusions in the Volume II or in drafts thereof.”

DOJ clearly does not view itself as bound by these same restrictions. On the afternoon of Friday, March 13, DOJ produced several documents involving the classified documents case to the House Committee on the Judiciary, including non-public information apparently barred from release by Judge Cannon’s order. What is more, a significant portion of the pages in one production are marked “Contains 6(e) and Sealed Material”—material that would be a crime for DOJ prosecutors to disclose to third parties, including to Congress. This document not only seemingly actually contains grand jury material, it obliterates the government’s own argument before Judge Cannon that a “careful Rule 6(e) review is no longer feasible given … the departures of Special Counsel Smith and his team from the Department of Justice.” In short, the position of the DOJ appears to be that it can violate Judge Cannon’s order and grand jury secrecy whenever it sees an opportunity to smear Jack Smith.

Most damning is what these documents, cherry-picked by your own DOJ for disclosure,show about President Trump’s conduct. They include a January 13, 2023, memorandum, inwhich prosecutors wrote that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has determined that the classified documents President Trump retained from the White House “were commingled with documents created after Trump left office.” FBI has also found that certain classified documents President Trump improperly retained “would be pertinent to certain business interests.” DOJ prosecutors further assessed that these “classified documents pertinent to his business interests” established “a motive for retaining them. We must have those documents.”

The memorandum further specifies that the disclosure of these documents represented“an aggravated potential harm to national security.” The prosecutors also wrote that these were “highly sensitive documents—the type of documents that only presidents and officials with the most sensitive authority have.” One “particularly sensitive document was accessible by only 6? people, including the president.”

The memorandum also details the extent to which the President and his staff acted recklessly with our nation’s most sensitive secrets. A then-23-year-old Trump aide and currentDirector of Oval Office Operations, Chamberlain Harris, “scanned” the contents of one box onto her laptop and retained it for nearly two years. Ms. Harris also “uploaded the scan to a cloud.”A Trump lawyer had to retrieve this scan from Ms. Harris’s laptop and then fly on a commercialairline with the thumb drive containing the classified documents. DOJ redacted the subsequent text in the memorandum, so we are unable to determine the full extent of this incident or whether these documents were compromised.

Similarly, in June 2022, President Trump apparently took classified documents on a flight to his golf club in Bedminster, NJ. Prosecutors determined that they “identified a classified map that we believe Trump may have shown to individuals on board” that airplane and that their investigation “indicates that Susan Wiles, the CEO of Trump’s Super PAC was aboard that flight and witnessed this event.” The memorandum does not specify who else might have seenthis document. DOJ produced a map of the aircraft, enclosed with this letter, but with all names of passengers redacted.

Without access to Volume II of the Special Counsel’s final report or the investigative files, we do not know what that classified map contained, nor can we determine from this memo the relationship between the classified documents President Trump stole and their pertinence to his “business interests.” We do know that around the time of this flight to Bedminster, President Trump was entering into partnerships with Saudi-backed LIV Golf and state-linked real estate firm Dar al Arkan. A month after this flight, in July 2022, President Trump played golf at Bedminster with Yasir al-Rumayyan, head of the sovereign wealth fund of Saudi Arabia—the same official who plied the Trump family with tens of millions of dollars as the family began torun out of money between terms.

During this trip, President Trump defended his business partners from criticism levied by the families of 9/11 victims protesting the Saudi government’srole in the attack, saying inaccurately that “nobody’s gotten to the bottom of 9/11, unfortunately.” We also know that there are reports that Donald Trump, at one point while on the phone with his ghost-writer, “made a reference to having classified records relating to the bombing of Iran.” He also reportedly boasted that it was only the hawks who wanted to attack Iran, not him, and that he had Pentagon war plans “done by the military and given to me” about such a potential attack.

If this map is related to our military posture in the Middle East, and it was in fact shown to any foreign official, Saudi or otherwise, that would amount to an unforgiveable betrayal of ourmen and women in uniform who are currently valiantly fighting in President Trump’s disastrous war against Iran.

It is now clear that DOJ is in possession of evidence that President Trump has already endangered national security to further the interests of Trump family businesses. It is time for you to stop the cover-up and allow the American people to know what secrets he betrayed and how he may have cashed in on them. Our country is at war, American lives are at stake, and the answer to these questions has never been more pressing.

Accordingly, please provide detailed answers to the following questions by 5:00 p.m. on March 31, 2026, all of which are required to understand the full context of the documents your DOJ itself produced. Should any of the answers to these questions require the exposure of classified information or information which could harm the national security of the United States and its servicemembers, Members and staff stand ready to receive that information in a SensitiveCompartmented Information Facility (SCIF).

1. Who else was on the plane with President Trump from Florida to Bedminster, New Jersey on June 3, 2022?

2. Who on that plane did President Trump show the classified map to? Did the Special Counsel’s Office find any evidence that President Trump showed the map to anyone else?

3. What did the classified map detail?

4. Which documents did President Trump improperly retain that were pertinent to his business interests, and which specific business interests?

5. Which members of President Trump’s family engaged in his business ventures saw or were made aware of the content of these classified documents? Please specifically reference Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump, and Barron Trump in your answer.

6. Which document did President Trump steal that was so sensitive that only six people in the entire federal government had access to it?

7. Did any of the documents President Trump stole or showed to other individuals after your term in office relate to the U.S. government’s war plans in the MiddleEast?

8. Did any foreign actors access, or attempt to access, these classified documents, either in their paper form or when uploaded to staffers’ computers? If so, which foreign actors?

In addition, DOJ must cease cherry-picking investigative materials and produce all remaining investigative files, including memoranda, emails, and analyses prepared by the Special Counsel’s Office by 5:00 p.m. on April 14, 2026. As a matter of priority, DOJ must produce the unredacted seating chart of the aircraft, the redacted version of which is enclosed with this letter, and the full, unredacted January 13, 2023, memo at DOJ-JSAF-031326-000085 to DOJ-JSAF-031326-000096, subject to all rules regarding grand jury secrecy.

Thank you for your attention to these important oversight requests. I look forward to your prompt attention to this grave matter.

Very truly yours,________________________Jamie Raskin Ranking Member
March 21, 2026

I don't know why Sen. Schumer stays in his position

...it's basically a thankless job in the minority representing the elected Dems who put him there, especially the ones who think it's some brilliant imperative to call for reshuffling the Democratic deck in the middle of the game like the party did with their incumbent president the last time around.

You'd think people would have learned a lesson from that defeat, but it seems all they realized was their ability to gaslight pols out of office who've already fought and won against republicans; most of their critics, not so much experienced in any of that, despite their enthusiastic suggestions to people who have, repeatedly.

I really don't know why any pol would willingly place themselves in the position of representing Dems in the Senate while we're in the minority, most of the members they would represent believing THEY could be president; managing all of that with all of the derision they get from people out here who can't be bothered to actually look to see what they say or do, much less take the time to understand the challenges of governing in a minority.

People say they want a boffo spokesperson, but what they really want is someone to roil reality and sew a silk purse out of the sow's ear that Dem voters provided the leaders with last election.

All elected Dems can actually do in the minority IS to perform for everyone; for people who think they are there to convince THEM to show up on election day and oppose a convicted criminal insurrectionist and his enabling party.

The Dem leader right now in the Senate presided over ALL of Biden's historic legislative accomplishments in the majority, even with TWO recalcitrant Dems who often sided with republicans on important legislation. Dem's ALWAYS produce historic progressive legislative changes in the majority.

But they needed the support of people who couldn't be bothered last election to equip Dem leaders with a sufficient number of members to work with. So they're reduced to this bullshit parrying for position among elected Dems chafing at the fecklessness of their minority positions and reduced to lashing out at the people they're able to actually affect; their own.

That's what abusive, dysfunctional families do. They project all of the shit coming from everywhere else onto the people they should be coalescing with and tear them down, I think because they find it too hard for them to do the same to the actual republican opposition.

What a stupid game. It's not really support for the party to publicly denigrate it and our leaders, no matter how popular it may well be right now. It produces nothing but apathy and abandonment of our party at the time we need unity.

Funny how it always comes right at the time we desperately need to unite; all of this self-immolation pretending like it's progress; forgetting the game here is addition, not subtraction.

If I were Schumer, I'd just turn on my heel and go home. He's gets nothing out of this role but shit, and it's just piling up as his detractors pile it on.

I mean, who is looking at this and thinking they want that thankless role in a party that voters didn't even bother to equip with enough members to do squat but object to what the majority does?

Self immolating should work out just as well as the last time people in the party convinced themselves it was some sort of political genius. Schumer should understand that people need to just FA and FO for themselves. It's a wonder he's still willing to continue to stand in the way of this stupidity.

March 16, 2026

What will be the effect of Trump calling the Supreme Court 'weaponized and politicized?'

Acyn @Acyn 4m
Trump: Our Country was unnecessarily RANSACKED by the United States Supreme Court, which has become little more than a weaponized and unjust Political Organization.

10:49 PM · Mar 15, 2026
x.com/Acyn/status/2033375041849843874



Setting aside the bizarre way this screed perfectly reflects his own actions and presidency, including intentions for the court; and putting aside the utter inanity of this president unable to resist his own worst impulses to touch and undo everything he's not supposed to, including his own word; he's evidently trying to intimidate them.

Will they be cowed by this rhetoric into further bending his way on the myriad cases before them?

Or will this anger and challenge them to the point they finally make a definitive stand against his abuse of executive authority?

...the part where he whines here that, 'Democrats always stick together... Republicans do not do this.'

Profile Information

Gender: Male
Hometown: Maryland
Member since: Sun Aug 17, 2003, 11:39 PM
Number of posts: 94,272
Latest Discussions»bigtree's Journal